why religion?
Home About the book Intoduction About the author Titles Buy the book

 
     Mexico - creation of its Society- (p. 382)
 
 


- In 1522, King Carlos I of Spain, in recognition of Cortez's conquests, appointed him governor of 'New Spain', eventually renamed Mexico. Prior to the Spanish conquest, the Aztec tribe, known for their practice of human sacrifices, lived in Mexico. Between the years 1520 and 1620, the Indian population in Mexico decreased from 22 million to less than one million - primarily as a result of exposure to viruses that the Spanish had introduced to the region, to which the Indians had no immunity. From 1545 until the 19th century, Black slaves were brought from the Antiles and Africa, many of whom married Indian or mestizo spouses and were absorbed into the diverse population. They were called Castas. Many Blacks also died of diseases from European viruses. The colonial government divided the Whites into two hierarchical groups: the Gachopins, born in Spain, who held government, church, and army positions or any other position that involved loyalty to the throne, and the Creoles - Whites born as Whites in Mexico itself. While these two groups were in theory equal, in practice, the Creoles were banned from important positions. The Indians were perceived as inferior but the government prohibited selling them as slaves and made it compulsory to pay them for their work. Mestizos were required to pay a special tax, and it was forbidden for them to study certain subjects, such as law. Like the Indians, they were not allowed to carry weapons and to live in certain areas. Nevertheless, in the army Gachopins, Creoles and mestizos (mixture of white and Indian) all served together. Towards the end of the 18th century, Europe's Enlightenment ideas began filtering into Mexico, prompting a reassessment of Indian heritage and the Spanish conquest, and inviting a Mexican nationalistic identification with Indian symbols and myths such as 'the Guadelopa Virgin'. In the second half of the 18th century, as a result of the American and French revolutions, Creoles began to identify more as Mexicans. In 1808 a French king was crowned in Mexico. The Gachopins identified with the local military J`unta and the Creoles claimed that sovereignty had been restored to the people. A race war broke out. 1823 the Mexican congress assembled and ratified a federal constitution, which appointed a president who freed the slaves, abolished aristocracy titles and limited church owned property. The Gachopins fled, in this period, to Spain, taking much wealth with them and initiating a long period of economic deadlock and politic chaos. A civil war took place in which the church played an integral role since it opposed Mexico's secular constitution. In 1876 a president was elected who established a stable government that cruelly suppressed the Indian uprising. The regime was firm and brutal, and responsible for election fraud, yet the economic state was stable and foreigners began investing in Mexico. Initially, church lands were distributed in order to build big estates, peasants were dispossessed of their land and the ruling class was comprised of Creoles. Meanwhile, the number of mestizos grew. In 1912 a civil war broke out which ultimately led to the separation of Church and State, the renewed distribution of land, and the establishment of schools in agrarian regions. The 'Nationalist Revolutionary Party' was established in 1929 to protest a halt in land distribution. This party became the only real political force and in 1934 the distribution of land was renewed with vigor. Since then the government in Mexico has been stable and based on a culture that is a fusion of three elements - Indian culture, Spanish culture, and modern Mexican culture. The Mexican is characterized by his incongruous nature. He loves and respects tradition, appreciates honesty and proper etiquette, is usually friendly and discrete - but sometimes he can become cold and aloof. His temperament is unstable. He does not pursue his goal with sufficient dedication and commitment. He wants to know and try everything and at times will be unruly. He is quick to grasp things, yet violent. He loves life, children and partying above all. Beyond this, the Mexican lives with a profound awareness of death, an awareness tied to the Aztec myth of creation. The bullfight represents the celebration of death. The bull symbolizes death that sometimes takes us by surprise. On November 2nd every year, children play with skull shaped toys - an activity that makes the concept of death less foreign to them. This distinctively Mexican motif of death fuses elements of Spanish and Indian culture. Mexicans consider coexistence and integration of the races an ideal state and from this stems the prohibition in Mexico against writing down a person's origins. This attitude developed as a consequence of civil wars in which both sides sought the alliance of the Indians. This is why the revolutions were connected to the apportionment of land and redressing the injustice that was done in confiscating Indian land. Pregnant women refrain from killing animals since there is a Mexican superstition that the soul of the animal may enter the body of the baby, as well as a myth connected to the Talopha Matphic virgin. Breaching one's godfather's trust is considered one of the most serious offenses, an attitude whose roots are in Spanish culture, a fusion of hierarchy, patronage and intimacy. As a result of all these factors, the Mexicans lack any clear ethnic connection. Their language and religion were bequeathed to them by their Spanish conquerors while their primordial traditional heritage is Indian in nature. Thus, culturally, they are Spanish and Western, while emotionally they are Indian - a synthesis that is distinctly Mexican. The Mexican definition of nationalism dates back less than 70 years old, from the time political reforms were introduced in the year 1934. Their definition is a late 20th century one and is based on the principle of inclusion of all classes, including the Indians, and on political equality. In practice, Mexican society remained hierarchical and based on patronage, as Roniger described. Roniger defines hierarchic patronage in its most expansive sense, which goes to the root of these basic concepts in Latin American society. Patronage is intertwined with accepted societal norms in various ways. The most common is when employment opportunities are offered in exchange for one's support in an elections. A patronage relationship may be formed when politicians have the means to guarantee a loan, a spot in a high school, or a bed in a hospital to their friends, to friends of friends, and to mere supporters, and public officials have the ability to grant preferential care - in exchange for political support. People seek a connection with a powerful person in order to secure political protection, or in order to raise their social status. Arrangements, such as these, would be illegal in modern Western countries but they are a standard accepted norm in Latin America, in general, and in Mexico, in particular. These are some of the factors that create a nationalism that is a mixed weave of modern and ancient, where equality is theoretically and fundamentally part of the democratic ideology but is not personified in social conduct, where races and ethnic classes are meant to preserve their distinctness and in practice intermingle with each other. Mexico, in contrast to the US, does not deny the racial inequality that exists in its country, though in practice, racial integration takes place, and is gradually even becoming an ideal.
 
Forum

Rivyon.com - רביון